Judiciary : Constitutional, Civil and Criminal Courts and Processes

Given/Context: The question relates to the Supreme Court's power of judicial review over constitutional amendments.

Answer:

The Supreme Court can strike down a legislation aimed at amending the Constitution on the following two grounds:

1. Violation of the Basic Structure Doctrine: As laid down in *Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala* (1973), Parliament cannot amend the Constitution in a manner that destroys or abrogates its 'basic structure' or 'basic features'. If a constitutional amendment violates the basic structure (e.g., supremacy of the Constitution, rule of law, independence of judiciary, fundamental rights, etc.), the Supreme Court can strike it down.

2. Violation of the Procedure prescribed under Article 368: If the amendment has not been passed in accordance with the procedure laid down under Article 368 of the Constitution (e.g., lack of required special majority, or absence of ratification by State Legislatures where required), the Supreme Court can declare it unconstitutional on the ground of procedural impropriety.

Conclusion: Thus, a constitutional amendment can be invalidated either for violating the substantive basic structure of the Constitution or for non-compliance with the mandatory procedure under Article 368.

Given/Context: The question relates to the advisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 143 of the Constitution of India.

Advisory Jurisdiction — Article 143: The President of India may refer any question of law or fact of public importance to the Supreme Court for its opinion. The Supreme Court, after hearing the matter, may report its opinion to the President. Such an opinion is advisory and not binding.

(i) Re Kerala Education Bill Case (1958):

The Supreme Court laid down the following principles:
- The Supreme Court may (not must) give its opinion; it has discretion to refuse if the question is ambiguous or not of public importance.
- The opinion given is not binding — it is merely advisory in nature.
- The Court held that it could examine the constitutionality of a Bill even before it becomes law, i.e., the advisory jurisdiction can be exercised in respect of a pending Bill.
- The Court clarified that the reference must involve a substantial question of law of public importance.

(ii) Re Special Court Bill Case (1979):

The Supreme Court laid down the following principles:
- The Court reiterated that the advisory opinion is not a judicial pronouncement and is not binding on any court or party.
- The Court held that it is not obligatory for the Supreme Court to answer every reference; it retains the discretion to decline.
- The Court clarified that the advisory jurisdiction is a special and exceptional jurisdiction and must be exercised with caution.
- It was held that the Court can examine whether the Bill, if enacted, would be constitutionally valid.

Conclusion: Both cases affirm that the Supreme Court's advisory jurisdiction under Article 143 is discretionary, non-binding, and can be exercised even in respect of Bills before they become law.

Given/Context: The appointment of judges to the Supreme Court is governed by Article 124 of the Constitution of India.

Constitutional Provisions for Appointment of a Supreme Court Judge:

Article 124(2): Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be appointed by the President of India by warrant under his hand and seal after consultation with such of the Judges of the Supreme Court and of the High Courts in the States as the President may deem necessary.

Qualifications [Article 124(3)]: A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judge of the Supreme Court unless he/she:
- Is a citizen of India, AND
- Has been a Judge of a High Court (or two or more such Courts in succession) for at least five years, OR
- Has been an Advocate of a High Court (or two or more such Courts in succession) for at least ten years, OR
- Is, in the opinion of the President, a distinguished jurist.

Collegium System: Through judicial pronouncements (the Three Judges Cases — 1982, 1993, 1998), the Supreme Court evolved the Collegium System. Under this system:
- The appointment of the Chief Justice of India is made on the basis of seniority.
- Appointments of other judges are made on the recommendation of the Collegium, consisting of the Chief Justice of India and the four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court.
- The President is bound by the recommendation of the Collegium (after the Second Judges Case, 1993).

Oath [Article 124(6)]: Every judge takes an oath before the President or a person appointed by him.

Tenure: A judge of the Supreme Court holds office until the age of 65 years [Article 124(2)].

Conclusion: The appointment of Supreme Court judges is a constitutional process involving the President and the Collegium, ensuring judicial independence.

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Short Note

Introduction:
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is a procedural law that governs the procedure to be followed in civil courts in India. It came into force on 1st January, 1909 and applies to the whole of India except the State of Jammu & Kashmir (now Union Territory) and certain tribal areas.

Structure:
The CPC consists of:
- 2 Parts: The Body (Sections 1–158) and the Schedule (Orders 1–51 with Rules).
- The Sections lay down the general principles, while the Orders and Rules provide the detailed procedure.

Objective:
The primary objective of the CPC is to consolidate and amend the laws relating to the procedure of courts of civil judicature. It aims to ensure that civil disputes are decided in a fair, orderly, and efficient manner.

Key Provisions:
1. Jurisdiction of Courts: The CPC defines the jurisdiction of civil courts — territorial, pecuniary, and subject-matter jurisdiction.
2. Plaint and Written Statement: It lays down the procedure for filing a plaint (by the plaintiff) and written statement (by the defendant).
3. Summons: Procedure for issuing summons to the defendant.
4. Framing of Issues: The court frames issues (points of dispute) to be decided.
5. Discovery and Inspection: Provisions for parties to discover documents.
6. Trial: Examination of witnesses, cross-examination, and arguments.
7. Judgment and Decree: The court pronounces judgment and passes a decree.
8. Execution of Decree: Provisions for enforcement of decrees.
9. Appeals, Reference, Review, and Revision: Remedies available after the decree.
10. Res Judicata (Section 11): A matter once decided cannot be re-litigated between the same parties.
11. Temporary Injunctions and Interlocutory Orders: Interim relief to parties.

Amendments:
The CPC has been amended several times, notably in 1976 and 2002, to reduce delays and simplify procedures.

Conclusion:
The CPC is the backbone of civil litigation in India. It ensures that civil disputes are resolved through a structured, transparent, and just process, balancing the rights of both parties.

What is Jurisdiction?

Definition: Jurisdiction refers to the legal authority or power of a court to hear, try, and decide a case. It is derived from the Latin words *'juris'* (law) and *'dictio'* (to speak), meaning 'to speak the law'. A court can only adjudicate a matter if it has the requisite jurisdiction; otherwise, its decision will be null and void.

Types of Jurisdiction (Any Two):

1. Territorial Jurisdiction (also called Local Jurisdiction):
- Every court has a defined geographical area within which it can exercise its authority.
- A court can only hear cases that arise within its territorial limits.
- *Example:* A District Court in Delhi can only hear cases arising within the territorial limits of Delhi. It cannot hear a case arising in Mumbai.
- In civil matters, the suit is generally filed where the defendant resides or where the cause of action arises [Section 20, CPC].
- In criminal matters, the case is tried where the offence was committed [Section 177, CrPC].

2. Pecuniary Jurisdiction:
- Pecuniary jurisdiction refers to the monetary value or financial limit of cases that a court is empowered to try.
- Different courts are empowered to hear cases involving different amounts of money.
- *Example:* A Munsiff Court may hear civil suits up to a certain monetary value (e.g., up to ₹1 lakh), while a District Court may hear suits of higher value. The High Court has unlimited pecuniary jurisdiction in original civil matters.
- This ensures that cases of smaller financial value are decided at the lower court level, reducing the burden on higher courts.

Other types of jurisdiction (for reference): Subject-matter jurisdiction, Original jurisdiction, Appellate jurisdiction, Advisory jurisdiction.

Conclusion: Jurisdiction is a fundamental concept in law that determines which court is competent to hear a particular case. Without proper jurisdiction, any order passed by a court is without legal effect.

Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India

Introduction:
The Supreme Court of India is the highest court of appeal in the country. Its appellate jurisdiction means the power to hear appeals against the decisions of lower courts. The appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is provided under Articles 132, 133, 134, and 136 of the Constitution.

1. Appeals in Constitutional Matters [Article 132]:
- An appeal lies to the Supreme Court from any judgment, decree, or final order of a High Court (whether in civil, criminal, or other proceedings) if the High Court certifies that the case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution.
- If the High Court refuses to grant the certificate, the Supreme Court may grant special leave to appeal.

2. Appeals in Civil Matters [Article 133]:
- An appeal lies to the Supreme Court from any judgment, decree, or final order of a High Court in a civil proceeding if the High Court certifies:
- (a) That the case involves a substantial question of law of general importance, AND
- (b) That in the opinion of the High Court, the said question needs to be decided by the Supreme Court.

3. Appeals in Criminal Matters [Article 134]:
The Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction in criminal matters in the following cases:
- (a) If the High Court has reversed an order of acquittal of an accused and sentenced him to death.
- (b) If the High Court has withdrawn a case from a subordinate court and convicted the accused and sentenced him to death.
- (c) If the High Court certifies that the case is fit for appeal to the Supreme Court.
- Parliament may by law extend the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in criminal matters.

4. Special Leave to Appeal [Article 136]:
- This is the most important and wide-ranging appellate power of the Supreme Court.
- The Supreme Court may, in its discretion, grant special leave to appeal from any judgment, decree, determination, sentence, or order passed by any court or tribunal in India (except military tribunals).
- This is an extraordinary jurisdiction and is exercised sparingly, only when there is a grave miscarriage of justice or a substantial question of law is involved.
- It is not a matter of right but of the court's discretion.

Conclusion:
The appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court ensures that justice is not denied due to errors by lower courts. It acts as the final arbiter of law and protects the rights of citizens by correcting erroneous decisions of High Courts and other tribunals.

Three Stages in the Procedure for Administration of Criminal Justice in India

The administration of criminal justice in India follows a structured procedure under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). The entire process can be broadly divided into three stages:

---

Stage 1: Investigation

This is the first stage of the criminal justice process.

- When a cognizable offence is committed, the police register a First Information Report (FIR) under Section 154 of the CrPC.
- For non-cognizable offences, the police require the permission of a Magistrate before investigating.
- The police then conduct an investigation, which includes:
- Visiting the scene of crime
- Collecting evidence (physical, documentary, forensic)
- Examining witnesses
- Arresting the accused (if necessary)
- Recording statements
- After completing the investigation, the police file a Charge Sheet (Final Report) under Section 173 CrPC before the competent Magistrate if sufficient evidence is found, or a closure report if no evidence is found.

---

Stage 2: Inquiry / Committal Proceedings (Pre-Trial)

- On receiving the charge sheet, the Magistrate examines it and decides whether there is sufficient ground to proceed.
- If the offence is exclusively triable by the Sessions Court, the Magistrate conducts a committal proceeding and commits the case to the Sessions Court.
- The Magistrate may also take cognizance of the offence and issue summons or warrants to the accused.
- The accused is brought before the court, and charges are framed against him/her.
- The accused is asked to plead — guilty or not guilty.
- If the accused pleads guilty, the court may convict; if not guilty, the case proceeds to trial.

---

Stage 3: Trial

This is the final and most important stage.

- The trial is conducted before the competent court (Magistrate's Court or Sessions Court depending on the nature of the offence).
- The prosecution presents its evidence first — examination-in-chief, cross-examination by defence, and re-examination.
- The accused is given an opportunity to present his/her defence.
- After hearing both sides, the court pronounces its judgment.
- If convicted, the court passes the sentence.
- The aggrieved party may file an appeal before a higher court.

---

Conclusion:
The three stages — Investigation, Inquiry, and Trial — together form a comprehensive system that ensures that the guilty are punished and the innocent are protected, upholding the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty'.

Six Stages in a Criminal Trial

A criminal trial in India follows a systematic procedure under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). The six stages are:

---

Stage 1: Framing of Charges

- After the accused is brought before the court and the court takes cognizance of the offence, charges are framed against the accused.
- The charge is a formal written statement specifying the offence the accused is alleged to have committed.
- The charges are read out and explained to the accused in a language he/she understands.
- The accused is asked whether he/she pleads guilty or not guilty.
- If the accused pleads guilty, the court may convict him/her. If not guilty, the trial proceeds.

---

Stage 2: Prosecution Evidence (Examination of Prosecution Witnesses)

- The prosecution (the State) presents its case first, as the burden of proof lies on the prosecution.
- The prosecution examines its witnesses (examination-in-chief).
- The defence lawyer then cross-examines the prosecution witnesses to challenge their credibility and the evidence.
- The prosecution may then re-examine its witnesses to clarify any points raised in cross-examination.
- Documentary and physical evidence is also produced and exhibited.

---

Stage 3: Statement of the Accused [Section 313 CrPC]

- After the prosecution evidence is complete, the court examines the accused personally under Section 313 CrPC.
- The purpose is to give the accused an opportunity to explain the circumstances appearing in the evidence against him/her.
- The accused is not required to take an oath and cannot be punished for refusing to answer or for giving false answers.
- This stage ensures that the accused is heard before any decision is made.

---

Stage 4: Defence Evidence

- The accused has the right to present his/her defence.
- The accused may examine defence witnesses (examination-in-chief).
- The prosecution then cross-examines the defence witnesses.
- The accused may also produce documentary evidence in support of the defence.
- The accused is not compelled to be a witness against himself/herself (Article 20(3) of the Constitution).

---

Stage 5: Final Arguments (Closing Arguments)

- After all evidence is recorded, both sides present their final arguments (oral and/or written) before the court.
- The prosecution argues first, summarising the evidence and urging the court to convict the accused.
- The defence then presents its arguments, pointing out weaknesses in the prosecution's case and seeking acquittal.
- The prosecution may be given a right of reply in certain cases.

---

Stage 6: Judgment

- After hearing the arguments, the court pronounces its judgment — either conviction or acquittal.
- If the accused is acquitted, he/she is set free.
- If the accused is convicted, the court proceeds to hear arguments on sentencing.
- The court then passes the sentence — imprisonment, fine, or both, depending on the nature of the offence.
- The convicted person has the right to appeal before a higher court.

---

Conclusion:
The six stages of a criminal trial — Framing of Charges, Prosecution Evidence, Statement of Accused, Defence Evidence, Final Arguments, and Judgment — ensure a fair, transparent, and just process, upholding the principles of natural justice.