Bricks, Beads and Bones (The Harappan Civilization)

Given/Context: Archaeological evidence from Harappan sites provides information about food items through finds of grain, animal bones, and other remains.

Food Items Available:

The following food items were available to people in Harappan cities:

1. Cereals/Grains: Wheat, barley, lentil, chickpea, and sesame were found at various Harappan sites. Millets were found from sites in Gujarat. Rice finds are relatively rare.
2. Meat: Cattle, sheep, goat, buffalo, and pig were domesticated animals whose bones have been found. Bones of wild species such as boar, deer, and gharial are also found, suggesting meat from hunting.
3. Fish and Fowl: Bones of fish and fowl have also been recovered.

Groups Who Provided These:

- Farmers/Agriculturalists: They would have cultivated wheat, barley, lentils, chickpeas, sesame, and millets. Evidence of ploughed fields (Kalibangan), terracotta models of ploughs (Banawali, Cholistan), and irrigation canals (Shortughai) supports this.
- Pastoralists/Herders: They would have reared and supplied domesticated animals like cattle, sheep, goat, buffalo, and pig.
- Hunters: Wild animals like boar, deer, and gharial may have been hunted either by the Harappans themselves or by specialised hunting communities who traded meat with city dwellers.
- Fishermen: Fish and fowl were likely provided by fishing communities living near rivers and coasts.

Given/Context: Archaeologists use material remains — burials, artefacts, settlement patterns — to reconstruct social and economic differences in Harappan society.

Methods Used by Archaeologists:

1. Study of Burials: Cemeteries at sites like Harappa show that while the dead were generally buried with pottery, some burials contain ornaments and other objects, suggesting differences in status or wealth. However, the differences are not very sharp.
2. Distribution of Artefacts: Rare and valuable objects (made of gold, faience, carnelian, lapis lazuli) are concentrated in large settlements like Mohenjodaro and Harappa, and are rarely found in smaller settlements. This indicates economic inequality between large urban centres and smaller villages.
3. Study of Settlements: The division of cities into a 'Citadel' (higher, smaller, with public/elite structures) and a 'Lower Town' (larger, residential) suggests a social hierarchy.
4. Hoards: Gold jewellery found in hoards indicates that precious metals were owned by a select few.

Differences Noticed:

- Between settlements: Large cities like Mohenjodaro had miniature faience pots, gold jewellery, and elaborate public structures, while smaller settlements like Kalibangan had none of these.
- Within settlements: The Citadel area (with the Great Bath, warehouse) was distinct from the residential Lower Town, suggesting that certain groups had access to special structures.
- In burials: Some graves contain more objects than others, though the differences are not extreme, suggesting a relatively moderate level of social differentiation compared to other ancient civilisations.

Given/Context: The Harappan drainage system is described by archaeologist Ernest Mackay as 'the most complete ancient system as yet discovered.'

Answer: Yes, the drainage system in Harappan cities strongly indicates town planning. The following reasons support this view:

1. Systematic Layout: Every house was connected to the street drains. This means the entire city was planned as a unit, with drainage considered from the very beginning of construction.
2. Quality of Construction: The main drainage channels were made of bricks set in mortar and covered with loose bricks that could be removed for cleaning. In some cases, limestone was used for covers. This shows careful engineering.
3. Provision for Maintenance: Sumps (cesspits) were provided at intervals in long drainage channels so that solid matter could settle and waste water could flow out. The presence of small heaps of sand alongside drains shows that they were regularly cleaned.
4. Uniformity Across Settlements: Drainage systems were not unique to large cities but were found in smaller settlements too. At Lothal, for example, drains were made of burnt bricks even though houses were of mud bricks. This uniformity across the civilisation points to centralised planning.
5. Privacy and Hygiene: The concern for sanitation and hygiene — with house drains emptying into street drains — reflects a planned, organised approach to urban living.

Conclusion: The sophisticated, uniform, and well-maintained drainage system is one of the strongest indicators of deliberate and systematic town planning in the Harappan civilisation.

Given/Context: Chanhudaro was almost exclusively devoted to craft production, including bead-making. A variety of materials and techniques were used.

Materials Used to Make Beads:

1. Stones: Carnelian (red colour), jasper, crystal, quartz, and steatite.
2. Metals: Copper, bronze, and gold.
3. Other materials: Shell, faience (a glass-like material), and terracotta (burnt clay).
4. Composite materials: Some beads were made of two or more stones cemented together; some had stone bodies with gold caps.

Process of Making Carnelian Beads (Detailed Description):

Carnelian is a beautiful red-coloured stone. The process of making carnelian beads involved the following steps:

1. Obtaining the Raw Material: The raw material of carnelian is yellowish in colour. Archaeologists' experiments have revealed that the red colour was obtained by firing the yellowish raw material at various stages of production.
2. Chipping: The nodules (lumps) of raw stone were first chipped into rough shapes.
3. Flaking: The rough shapes were then finely flaked to achieve the desired final form.
4. Grinding and Polishing: The flaked bead was then ground and polished to give it a smooth surface.
5. Drilling: Finally, a hole was drilled through the bead using specialised drills. Such drills have been found at Chanhudaro, Lothal, and Dholavira.

The shapes produced included disc-shaped, cylindrical, spherical, barrel-shaped, and segmented forms. Some beads were also decorated by incising or painting, and some had designs etched onto them.

Note: Fig. 1.30 depicts a burial from a Harappan cemetery. Based on the description provided in the chapter and standard archaeological knowledge of Harappan burials, the following answer is constructed.

Description of Fig. 1.30:

1. Position of the Body: The body (skeleton) is placed in an extended position, lying on its back, with the head generally pointing north and the feet pointing south. This is the typical burial orientation found in Harappan cemeteries.

2. Objects Placed Near the Body: Several pottery vessels have been placed near the body, particularly near the head and feet. These pots may have contained food or water meant for the deceased for use in the afterlife. This practice of placing pottery in graves is common across Harappan burial sites.

3. Artefacts on the Body: Some ornaments such as beads (shell or terracotta) may be visible on or near the body. In some Harappan burials, ornaments like necklaces, bangles, and other personal items are found placed on or with the skeleton.

4. Indication of Sex: The presence or absence of certain ornaments can sometimes suggest the sex of the skeleton. For example, ornaments like bangles and necklaces are often associated with female burials in archaeological contexts. However, it is important to note that Harappan cemeteries show relatively little social differentiation, and the objects placed in graves do not always clearly indicate the sex of the individual. A definitive determination of sex requires osteological analysis (study of bone structure) by physical anthropologists rather than relying solely on grave goods.

Introduction:
Mohenjodaro, meaning 'Mound of the Dead', is the most well-known and extensively excavated site of the Harappan civilisation, located in present-day Sindh, Pakistan. It covers an area of about 125 hectares and represents the pinnacle of Harappan urban planning and architecture.

1. Division into Two Sections — Citadel and Lower Town:
The most striking feature of Mohenjodaro is its division into two distinct sections:
- The Citadel — a smaller but higher area, built on a raised platform, probably housing public and elite structures.
- The Lower Town — a much larger but lower area, which was the main residential zone.

This two-part layout is a hallmark of major Harappan cities.

2. The Great Bath:
Located on the Citadel, the Great Bath is one of the most remarkable structures of the ancient world. It is a large rectangular tank (approximately 12 metres long, 7 metres wide, and 2.4 metres deep) set in a courtyard surrounded by corridors on all four sides. Two flights of steps on the north and south led into the tank. The tank was made watertight by setting bricks on edge and using a mortar of gypsum. Water flowed out through a huge drain. Scholars believe it was used for ritual bathing.

3. The Warehouse:
Also located on the Citadel, the warehouse was a massive structure. Only the lower brick portions survive; the upper portions were probably of wood and have decayed. It is believed to have been used for storing goods.

4. Residential Architecture of the Lower Town:
The Lower Town provides excellent examples of planned residential buildings:
- Most houses were centred on a courtyard, with rooms on all sides. The courtyard served as the centre of domestic activities like cooking and weaving.
- There were no windows in the walls along the ground level, indicating a concern for privacy.
- The main entrance did not give a direct view of the interior.
- Every house had its own bathroom paved with bricks, with drains connected to street drains.
- Many houses had wells, often accessible from outside, possibly for use by passers-by. Scholars estimate there were about 700 wells in Mohenjodaro.
- Some houses had staircases leading to a second storey or the roof.

5. The Drainage System:
Mohenjodaro had what archaeologist Ernest Mackay called 'the most complete ancient system as yet discovered.' Every house was connected to street drains. The main channels were made of bricks set in mortar, covered with removable bricks for cleaning. Sumps were provided at intervals to collect solid waste.

6. Standardised Bricks:
All bricks used in Mohenjodaro followed a uniform ratio (length:width:height = 4:2:1), a feature found across all Harappan sites, indicating centralised planning.

7. Seals and Script:
Thousands of seals have been found at Mohenjodaro, typically made of steatite, bearing animal motifs and an undeciphered script. These were used for trade and identification.

8. Artefacts:
Mohenjodaro has yielded remarkable artefacts including the famous 'priest-king' statue, the 'dancing girl' bronze figurine, miniature faience pots, gold jewellery, and a large number of terracotta figurines.

Conclusion:
Mohenjodaro stands as a testament to the sophisticated urban planning, engineering skills, and organised social life of the Harappan people. Its distinctive features — the Great Bath, the drainage system, the planned residential quarters, and the wealth of artefacts — make it one of the most important archaeological sites in the world.

Introduction:
The Harappan civilisation was characterised by remarkable craft specialisation. A wide variety of raw materials were used to produce beads, seals, weights, pottery, metal objects, and shell articles. Obtaining these materials required an extensive network of trade and exchange, as many raw materials were not locally available.

Raw Materials Required:

1. Stones:
- Carnelian (red colour) — used for beads
- Jasper, crystal, quartz — used for beads
- Steatite (soft stone) — used for seals and beads
- Chert — used for weights
- Lapis lazuli — used for ornaments

2. Metals:
- Copper and bronze — used for tools, vessels, and ornaments
- Gold — used for jewellery

3. Shell: Used for bangles, ladles, and inlay work.

4. Clay/Terracotta: Used for pottery, figurines, and some beads.

5. Faience: A glass-like material made from ground quartz, used for beads and miniature pots.

6. Wood: Used for construction (upper portions of buildings) and possibly for tool handles.

How These Materials Were Obtained:

1. Local Procurement:
Some raw materials were available locally. Clay for pottery and terracotta was widely available. Stone for tools and grinding equipment could be obtained from nearby rocky outcrops.

2. Establishing Settlements Near Raw Material Sources:
The Harappans strategically established settlements near sources of raw materials:
- Nageshwar and Balakot (near the coast) were specialised centres for shell-working, as shells were available from the sea.
- Shortughai in Afghanistan was possibly established to obtain lapis lazuli from the mines of Badakhshan.
- Sites in Rajasthan were close to copper deposits.

3. Long-Distance Trade:
Many raw materials had to be obtained through long-distance trade:
- Copper was probably obtained from Khetri in Rajasthan or from Oman (the copper found at Mesopotamian sites contains traces of nickel, similar to Omani copper, suggesting Harappan intermediary trade).
- Gold may have come from Karnataka or Afghanistan.
- Lapis lazuli came from Badakhshan (Afghanistan).
- Carnelian was available in Gujarat.
- Timber may have been obtained from forests in the Himalayan foothills.

4. Exchange with Other Communities:
The Harappans may have obtained some materials through exchange with pastoral or hunting communities. For example, they may have obtained meat and animal products from hunting communities.

5. Maritime Trade:
Harappan seals, weights, and beads have been found in Mesopotamia, Oman, and Bahrain, indicating active maritime trade. Mesopotamian texts mention 'Meluhha' (possibly the Harappan region) as a source of carnelian, lapis lazuli, copper, gold, and wood. This suggests that the Harappans both exported finished goods and imported raw materials through sea routes.

Centres of Craft Production:
Once raw materials were obtained, they were processed at specialised centres:
- Chanhudaro and Lothal were centres for bead-making and shell-cutting.
- Finished products were then sent to large urban centres like Mohenjodaro and Harappa.

Conclusion:
The procurement of raw materials for Harappan craft production was a complex, well-organised process involving local sourcing, strategic settlement placement, long-distance overland and maritime trade, and exchange networks. This reflects the sophisticated economic organisation of the Harappan civilisation.

Introduction:
Archaeology is the scientific study of the human past through material remains. Archaeologists working on the Harappan civilisation have used a variety of methods and techniques to reconstruct life in this ancient society. Since the Harappan script remains undeciphered, material evidence is the primary source of information.

1. Excavation:
The most fundamental method is excavation — the careful, systematic digging of archaeological sites. Early excavations at Harappa (1920s) and Mohenjodaro were conducted by archaeologists like Daya Ram Sahni and R.D. Banerji under the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). R.E.M. Wheeler, who became Director-General of ASI in 1944, introduced the method of following the stratigraphy of the mound — digging layer by layer to understand the sequence of occupation — rather than digging mechanically along horizontal lines. This allowed archaeologists to date different levels of occupation.

2. Analysis of Artefacts:
Artefacts (objects made or used by humans) are the primary evidence. Archaeologists analyse:
- Pottery to understand daily life, trade, and cultural connections.
- Tools (stone, copper) to understand technology and economy.
- Seals to understand trade, administration, and possibly religion.
- Weights to understand the economic system.
- Ornaments and jewellery to understand social status and craft production.

3. Study of Food Remains:
Archaeologists study plant remains (seeds of wheat, barley, lentils, sesame) to understand agricultural practices. Animal bones are studied by archaeo-zoologists to identify domesticated and wild species, thereby reconstructing dietary practices and the relationship between humans and animals.

4. Identifying Craft Production Centres:
To identify centres of craft production, archaeologists look for raw materials, tools, unfinished objects, rejects, and waste material. For example, waste from shell-cutting at Nageshwar and Balakot, and specialised drills at Chanhudaro, Lothal, and Dholavira, indicate these were craft production centres.

5. Use of Present-Day Analogies (Ethnoarchaeology):
Archaeologists sometimes use present-day practices to understand ancient artefacts. For example, Ernest Mackay compared ancient saddle querns with present-day grinding stones to understand their function. He also used the knowledge of his cook to identify 'curry stones'. This method, however, must be used cautiously.

6. Scientific Techniques:
Since the 1980s, modern scientific techniques have been increasingly used:
- Surface exploration to recover traces of clay, stone, metal, and plant and animal remains without full excavation.
- Radiocarbon dating and other dating techniques to establish the age of sites and artefacts.
- Archaeo-metallurgy to analyse the composition of metals (e.g., the nickel content of copper found at Mesopotamian sites helped establish trade links with the Harappan region).
- Archaeo-botany and archaeo-zoology for studying plant and animal remains.

7. Study of Burials:
Burials provide information about social differences, beliefs about the afterlife, and gender roles. The presence or absence of grave goods, their quantity and quality, helps archaeologists understand social hierarchy.

8. Comparative Study:
Archaeologists compare finds from different sites to understand trade networks, cultural uniformity, and regional variations. For example, the uniform brick ratio across all Harappan sites (from Jammu to Gujarat) suggests centralised planning or strong cultural unity.

Limitations:
Despite these methods, many questions remain unanswered. The undeciphered script is a major limitation. Questions about gender roles, the exact nature of political authority, and religious practices remain speculative. As the chapter notes, issues like whether the Great Bath was a ritual structure, the extent of literacy, and the role of women in craft production are still debated.

Conclusion:
Archaeologists reconstruct the past through a combination of careful excavation, systematic analysis of material remains, use of scientific techniques, and comparative study. Each new excavation and each new technique adds to our understanding, though many aspects of the Harappan civilisation remain a fascinating mystery.

Introduction:
One of the most debated questions in Harappan archaeology is the nature of political authority — who ruled, and how. Unlike Mesopotamia or Egypt, the Harappan civilisation has left no written records (the script is undeciphered), no clear depictions of kings or rulers, and no grand royal tombs. Yet, the extraordinary complexity and uniformity of the civilisation suggests that some form of authority existed.

Evidence for the Existence of Authority:

Several features of the Harappan civilisation indicate that complex decisions were taken and implemented by some authority:

1. Uniformity of Artefacts: Pottery, seals, weights, and bricks show remarkable uniformity across the entire civilisation — from Jammu to Gujarat. Bricks, though not produced in a single centre, maintained a uniform ratio (4:2:1) throughout the region. This suggests centralised control or strong administrative coordination.

2. Planned Settlements: Cities like Mohenjodaro show evidence of careful planning — the division into Citadel and Lower Town, the grid-like street layout, the uniform drainage system. Such planning requires authority to design, organise, and enforce.

3. Mobilisation of Labour: The construction of massive walls, platforms, the Great Bath, the warehouse, and the extensive drainage system required the mobilisation of large numbers of workers. This implies an authority capable of organising and directing labour.

4. Strategic Location of Settlements: Settlements were established near sources of raw materials (e.g., near the coast for shell, near copper deposits for metalworking). This suggests deliberate planning by some authority.

5. Standardised Weights: A precise, uniform system of weights (made of chert, generally cubical) was used across the civilisation. This suggests that exchange was regulated by some authority.

Possible Functions of Rulers:

Based on the above evidence, rulers (or ruling groups) in Harappan society may have performed the following functions:

1. Economic Regulation: Overseeing trade, regulating weights and measures, and controlling the distribution of raw materials and finished goods.
2. Urban Planning and Construction: Organising the construction of cities, public buildings (Great Bath, warehouse), drainage systems, and defensive walls.
3. Labour Organisation: Mobilising and directing labour for large construction projects.
4. Ritual Functions: The 'priest-king' statue found at Mohenjodaro suggests that rulers may have had ritual or religious roles, though this is speculative.
5. Administration of Trade: Seals and sealings were used to facilitate long-distance trade and communication. Rulers may have administered this system.

Debates Among Archaeologists:

Archaeologists hold different views on the nature of Harappan authority:
- Some believe there were no rulers and that everyone enjoyed equal status.
- Others suggest there were multiple rulers — one for Mohenjodaro, one for Harappa, etc.
- Yet others argue for a single state, given the uniformity of artefacts, planned settlements, standardised bricks, and strategic placement of settlements near raw materials.

The absence of spectacular royal burials, grand palaces, or clear depictions of rulers makes it difficult to reach a definitive conclusion.

Conclusion:
While the exact nature of political authority in the Harappan civilisation remains uncertain, the evidence strongly suggests that some form of organised authority existed. This authority likely performed functions related to economic regulation, urban planning, labour organisation, trade administration, and possibly ritual activities. The Harappan state, whatever its form, appears to have been a strong unifying force — its decline is associated with the collapse of the entire civilisation around 1800 BCE.

Note: This is a map-based activity that requires the student to work directly on Map 1 provided in the textbook. The following guidance is provided for completing the activity:

Sites to be Circled (Evidence of Agriculture):
Circle the following sites where evidence of agriculture (grain finds, ploughed fields, irrigation canals) has been found:
- Kalibangan (Rajasthan) — evidence of a ploughed field with two sets of furrows at right angles, associated with Early Harappan levels.
- Banawali (Haryana) — terracotta models of the plough have been found.
- Shortughai (Afghanistan) — traces of canals (irrigation) have been found.
- Cholistan — terracotta models of the plough have been found.
- Mohenjodaro and Harappa — grain finds (wheat, barley, lentils, sesame) have been recovered.
- Sites in Gujarat — millets have been found.

Sites to be Marked X (Evidence of Craft Production):
Mark X against the following sites:
- Chanhudaro — bead-making, shell-cutting, metal-working, seal-making, weight-making.
- Lothal — bead-making, shell-working; also has a warehouse/dockyard.
- Nageshwar — specialised centre for shell objects (bangles, ladles, inlay).
- Balakot — specialised centre for shell objects.
- Mohenjodaro and Harappa — evidence of various crafts.
- Dholavira — specialised drills for bead-making found here.

Sites to be Marked R (Raw Materials Found):
Mark R against the following sites:
- Shortughai (Afghanistan) — near lapis lazuli sources in Badakhshan.
- Sites in Rajasthan — near copper deposits (Khetri mines).
- Nageshwar and Balakot — near the coast (source of shells).
- Sites in Gujarat — near sources of carnelian and other semi-precious stones.

Instructions for the Student:
Using a pencil, locate each of the above sites on Map 1 in your textbook and mark them accordingly — circle for agriculture, X for craft production, and R for raw materials. Note that some sites may receive more than one marking (e.g., Mohenjodaro may be both circled and marked X).

Note: This is an individual project activity that requires the student to visit a local museum. The following is a model/sample report that students can use as a guide and adapt based on their own museum visit.

---

Museum Visit Report

Name of Museum: National Museum, New Delhi (Sample)
Date of Visit: [Student to fill in]
Purpose: To observe and report on ten historical items on display.

---

Item 1: Harappan Seal (c. 2500 BCE)
- Where Found: Mohenjodaro, Sindh (present-day Pakistan)
- Age: Approximately 4,500 years old
- Description: A small square seal made of steatite, bearing the image of a unicorn (one-horned bull) and a line of undeciphered Harappan script.
- Why on Display: It represents the sophisticated trade and administrative system of the Harappan civilisation and the still-mysterious Harappan script.

Item 2: Dancing Girl Bronze Figurine (c. 2500 BCE)
- Where Found: Mohenjodaro
- Age: Approximately 4,500 years old
- Description: A small bronze figurine of a young girl in a dancing pose, wearing bangles on her left arm.
- Why on Display: It is one of the most iconic artefacts of the Harappan civilisation, demonstrating advanced bronze-casting techniques and providing insight into Harappan art and culture.

Item 3: Terracotta Mother Goddess Figurine (c. 2500 BCE)
- Where Found: Various Harappan sites
- Age: Approximately 4,500 years old
- Description: A terracotta figurine of a female figure, possibly representing a mother goddess or fertility deity.
- Why on Display: It provides evidence of possible religious practices in the Harappan civilisation.

*(Students should continue in this format for all ten items based on what they actually see in the museum they visit.)*

---

Conclusion:
The museum visit was an enriching experience. Seeing these ancient objects in person gave me a much deeper appreciation of the sophistication and complexity of ancient Indian civilisations. The items on display have been carefully chosen to represent different aspects of life — economy, religion, art, and technology — in ancient India.

---

Note to Students: Replace the above sample items with the actual items you see in the museum you visit. Record the information provided on the labels/plaques next to each item, and add your own observations about why you think each item is significant enough to be on display.

Note: This is an individual project activity. The following is a model/sample comparison that students can use as a guide.

---

Project: Comparing Present-Day and Harappan Objects

Objects Collected (Present-Day):

| S.No. | Object | Material | Present-Day Use |
|-------|--------|----------|-----------------|
| 1 | Grinding stone (sil-batta) | Stone | Grinding spices |
| 2 | Mortar and pestle | Stone | Grinding herbs |
| 3 | Clay pot (matka) | Clay/Terracotta | Storing water |
| 4 | Clay lamp (diya) | Clay/Terracotta | Religious use/lighting |
| 5 | Copper vessel | Metal (Copper) | Storing/drinking water |
| 6 | Bronze idol | Metal (Bronze) | Religious worship |
| 7 | Gold necklace | Metal (Gold) | Jewellery/ornament |
| 8 | Clay figurine | Clay/Terracotta | Decoration/religious use |
| 9 | Stone weights | Stone | Weighing goods |
| 10 | Terracotta toys | Clay/Terracotta | Children's play |

---

Comparison with Harappan Objects:

Similarities:

1. Grinding Stones: The saddle quern described by Mackay in the chapter is very similar to the present-day sil-batta used in Indian kitchens for grinding spices. Both are made of hard stone and used for the same purpose.
2. Clay Pots: Harappan pottery (Fig. 1.14 in the chapter) and present-day clay pots are both made of terracotta, wheel-thrown, and used for storing food and water.
3. Copper Vessels: Copper tools and vessels were used in the Harappan civilisation (Fig. 1.4), just as copper vessels are used in many Indian households today.
4. Gold Jewellery: Gold jewellery was found in Harappan hoards, just as gold ornaments are worn today. The basic forms — necklaces, bangles — have remained similar.
5. Clay Figurines: Terracotta figurines (Fig. 1.15) were made in the Harappan period, and clay figurines are still made today for religious and decorative purposes.
6. Stone Weights: The Harappans used standardised stone weights for trade; stone and metal weights are still used in markets today.

Differences:

1. Technology: Harappan tools were made by chipping, flaking, and grinding stone, or by casting metal. Today, machine-made tools are far more precise and uniform.
2. Scale of Production: Harappan craft production was specialised and concentrated in specific centres (like Chanhudaro). Today, mass production in factories has replaced craft specialisation.
3. Materials: The Harappans used a wider variety of semi-precious stones (carnelian, lapis lazuli, jasper) for everyday ornaments. Today, these are considered luxury items.
4. Script/Markings: Harappan pottery and seals often bore the undeciphered Harappan script. Present-day objects use known scripts and languages for labelling.
5. Standardisation: The Harappan weight system was remarkably standardised across a vast region. Today, standardisation is enforced by governments and international bodies.

Conclusion:
This comparison shows that while the basic materials (stone, metal, clay) and many uses have remained the same over thousands of years, the technology, scale of production, and social context of these objects have changed dramatically. The continuity in the use of grinding stones, clay pots, and copper vessels suggests deep cultural continuities in Indian civilisation, while the differences highlight the enormous technological and social changes that have occurred since the Harappan period.