Our Environment — NCERT Solutions

Concept: In a food chain, each trophic level depends on the one below it for energy and controls the population of the one above it.

Effects of removing all organisms from one trophic level:

Case 1 – Removal of Producers (1st trophic level):

• All herbivores (primary consumers) will lose their food source and will die.
• This will cause the collapse of the entire food chain, leading to extinction of all consumers.
• The ecosystem will completely collapse.

Case 2 – Removal of Primary Consumers (Herbivores):

• Producers (plants) will overgrow without being grazed, leading to competition among plants.
• Secondary consumers (carnivores) will lose their food and their population will decline or become extinct.
• The food chain will break down.

Case 3 – Removal of Secondary Consumers (Carnivores):

• Primary consumers (herbivores) will multiply unchecked, leading to overgrazing.
• Producers will be rapidly depleted.
• The ecosystem balance will be disturbed.

Conclusion: Removing all organisms from any trophic level disrupts the balance of the ecosystem, leading to the collapse of food chains and loss of biodiversity.

Part 1 – Will the impact differ for different trophic levels?

Yes, the impact will be different for different trophic levels.

The lower the trophic level removed, the greater and more widespread the damage, because more organisms depend on it.

Part 2 – Can any trophic level be removed without damage?

No. No trophic level can be removed without causing damage to the ecosystem. Every organism plays a role in maintaining the balance of the ecosystem. The removal of any trophic level will:

• Disrupt the food chain.
• Cause population imbalances.
• Lead to loss of biodiversity.
• Ultimately destabilise the entire ecosystem.

Conclusion: All trophic levels are interdependent and essential for a stable, functioning ecosystem.

Biological Magnification (Biomagnification):

Biological magnification is the progressive increase in the concentration of harmful, non-biodegradable chemicals (such as pesticides like DDT, heavy metals like mercury) in the tissues of organisms at successively higher trophic levels in a food chain.

How it occurs:

• These chemicals are not broken down and are not excreted; they accumulate in fatty tissues.
• Each organism at a higher trophic level consumes many organisms from the level below, so the chemical concentration keeps increasing.

Example:
$$\text{Water} \rightarrow \text{Phytoplankton} \rightarrow \text{Small fish} \rightarrow \text{Large fish} \rightarrow \text{Bird/Human}$$

If DDT concentration in water = 0.003 ppb, it may reach up to 25 ppm in top predators — an increase of thousands of times.

Will magnification levels differ at different trophic levels?

Yes. The concentration of the harmful chemical:

• Is lowest at the producer level (1st trophic level).
• Increases progressively at each higher trophic level.
• Is highest at the top carnivore level (highest trophic level).

This is because each consumer eats a large number of organisms from the level below, accumulating more and more of the chemical in its body.

Conclusion: Biological magnification increases with each trophic level, making top predators (including humans) most vulnerable to toxic effects.

Non-biodegradable wastes are substances that cannot be broken down by biological processes (e.g., plastics, pesticides, heavy metals, glass, synthetic fibres).

Problems caused:

1. Soil pollution: Plastic and chemical wastes accumulate in soil, reducing its fertility and harming soil organisms.

2. Water pollution: Non-biodegradable chemicals and plastics enter water bodies, making water unfit for drinking and aquatic life.

3. Biological magnification: Pesticides and heavy metals enter food chains and accumulate in increasing concentrations at higher trophic levels, harming animals and humans (e.g., DDT causing reproductive failure in birds).

4. Harm to animals: Animals may accidentally ingest plastic waste, causing internal injuries or death.

5. Clogging of drains: Plastic waste blocks drainage systems, leading to waterlogging and spread of diseases.

6. Air pollution: Burning of non-biodegradable waste (e.g., plastics) releases toxic gases like dioxins and furans.

7. Long-term persistence: These wastes remain in the environment for hundreds of years, causing prolonged damage.

Conclusion: Non-biodegradable wastes pose serious and long-lasting threats to soil, water, air, and all living organisms in the ecosystem.

No, even if all waste is biodegradable, it will still have an impact on the environment.

Reasons:

1. Excess waste overwhelms decomposers: If the amount of biodegradable waste is very large, decomposers (bacteria, fungi) cannot break it down fast enough. The waste accumulates and causes pollution.

2. Foul smell and disease: Large quantities of rotting biodegradable waste produce foul odours and become breeding grounds for disease-causing organisms like flies, mosquitoes, and rats, spreading diseases.

3. Water pollution: Biodegradable waste dumped in or near water bodies decomposes and consumes dissolved oxygen (BOD increases), leading to the death of aquatic organisms.

4. Greenhouse gas emission: Decomposition of biodegradable waste produces methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂), which are greenhouse gases contributing to global warming and climate change.

5. Soil and groundwater contamination: Leachate from decomposing waste can seep into the soil and contaminate groundwater.

Conclusion: While biodegradable waste is less harmful than non-biodegradable waste, generating it in large quantities still has significant negative impacts on the environment. Waste minimisation is essential regardless of its nature.

Why is ozone layer damage a cause for concern?

The ozone layer (present in the stratosphere, about 15–35 km above Earth) absorbs most of the harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the Sun. Damage to this layer allows more UV radiation to reach the Earth's surface, causing:

1. In humans:

• Increased risk of skin cancer and sunburn.
• Cataracts and other eye disorders.
• Weakening of the immune system.

2. In plants:

• Reduced photosynthesis and crop yields.
• Damage to plant DNA.

3. In aquatic ecosystems:

• Destruction of phytoplankton (marine producers), disrupting aquatic food chains.

4. General environmental impact:

• Increased UV radiation can cause mutations in organisms.
• Disruption of entire ecosystems and loss of biodiversity.

Cause of ozone depletion:
Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) — used in refrigerators, air conditioners, and aerosol sprays — react with ozone molecules and break them down:
$$\text{CFC} \xrightarrow{\text{UV}} \text{Cl}^\bullet \quad ; \quad \text{Cl}^\bullet + \text{O}_3 \rightarrow \text{ClO}^\bullet + \text{O}_2$$

Steps being taken to limit damage:

1. Montreal Protocol (1987): An international agreement signed by most countries to phase out the production and use of ozone-depleting substances, especially CFCs.

2. Ban on CFCs: Many countries have banned or restricted the use of CFCs in refrigerants, aerosols, and fire extinguishers, replacing them with environment-friendly alternatives (e.g., HFCs, HCFCs).

3. Awareness campaigns: Governments and organisations spread awareness about the harmful effects of ozone depletion and encourage eco-friendly practices.

4. Research and monitoring: Continuous monitoring of the ozone layer (e.g., the Antarctic ozone hole) and research into safer chemical alternatives.

Conclusion: Damage to the ozone layer is a serious global concern because it threatens all life on Earth. International cooperation and individual responsibility are essential to protect and restore the ozone layer.